|
Expose the Links
between Al Qaeda and the Bush Administration - by Michel Chossudovsky
When
people across the US find out that Al Qaeda is not linked to Saddam but is
in fact a creation of the CIA and that the terrorist warnings are
fabricated, the legitimacy of the Bush Administration will tumble like a
deck of cards. The perceived enemy will no longer be Saddam, it will
be Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Powell, et al.
Why is
this important for the antiwar movement?
This
relationship of the Bush Administration to international terrorism, which
is a matter of public record, indelibly points to the criminalisation of
the upper echelons of US State apparatus.
Let's
use this information to dismantle the Bush Administration's war plans.
Sensitize our fellow citizens. Expose the "dubious links."
Because
when the truth trickles down, the leaders' war plans will not have a shred of
legitimacy in the eyes of millions of Americans who believe that Al
Qaeda is "A Threat to America" and that their president is
committed to their security.
At this
crucial juncture in our history, we must understand that antiwar sentiment
in itself does not undermine the war agenda. The same applies to the
diplomatic deadlock at the UN Security Council: The Bush Administration is
intent upon waging war with or without UN approval.
The only
way to prevent this war from happening in the weeks ahead is to unseat the
rulers, who are war criminals.
A
precondition for breaking the legitimacy of the Bush Administration is to
fully reveal its links to international terrorism and its complicity in the
tragic event of 9/11. This objective can only be achieved by effectively
curbing its propaganda campaign and spreading the truth through a
grassroots citizen's information campaign.
Faced
with a diplomatic deadlock in the UN Security Council, Washington’s
desperate pitch has been to link Iraq to Al Qaeda.
Osama
bin Laden’s Al Qaeda, --now "supported by Baghdad"-- is heralded ad
nauseam both in official statements and in the media as "an Enemy
of America", responsible for the 9/11 terrorist attacks. Realties are
twisted and turned up side down: Supported by Baghdad, Al
Qaeda "preparing to attack America", which
justifies a "preemptive" invasion of Iraq to "defend
the homeland."
In a
February CNN-Time Magazine opinion poll, 76 percent of those surveyed felt "Saddam
provides assistance to Al Qaeda." In another poll which
asked "Was Saddam Hussein personally involved in the September
11 attacks?" 72 percent said "it was either very or somewhat
likely." that Saddam was involved. (CNN,
11 March 2003)
But who
is this outside enemy?
While
Colin Powell --without supporting evidence-- points in his UN address to "the
sinister nexus between Iraq and the Al Qaeda terrorist network", official
documents, press and intelligence reports confirm that successive US
administrations have supported and abetted the Islamic militant network. This
relationship is an established fact, corroborated by numerous studies,
acknowledged by Washington's mainstream think tanks:
In the
1980s the United States fought another war in this region through similar
means, a covert war against the Soviet Union and a series of Soviet-backed
regimes in Afghanistan. Bin Laden and his terrorist associates, their
Afghan hosts, and the Pakistani military are all part of this past U.S.
history.... Given an opportunity to undermine the Soviet Union, the United
States became a partner in Pakistan's proxy war . ( Samina Ahmed, The United States and Terrorism in Southwest Asia;
September 11 and Beyond, International Security, 2001/2002 Winter)
With the active
encouragement of the CIA and Pakistan's ISI [Inter Services Intelligence],
who wanted to turn the Afghan jihad into a global war waged by all Muslim
states against the Soviet Union, some 35,000 Muslim radicals from 40
Islamic countries joined Afghanistan's fight between 1982 and 1992. Tens of
thousands more came to study in Pakistani madrasahs. Eventually more than
100,000 foreign Muslim radicals were directly influenced by the Afghan
jihad. (Ahmed Rashid, The Taliban: Exporting Extremism, Foreign Affairs,
November-December 1999).
Al Qaeda
was created and sustained by US foreign policy. Yet according to Powell in
his "authoritative" February 5 UN presentation:
"These
al Qaeda affiliates, based in Baghdad, now coordinate the movement of
people, money and supplies into and throughout Iraq for his network, and
they've been operating freely in the capital for more than eight
months"
The Big
Lie
In the
months leading up to the invasion of Iraq, the foreign policy lies have
become increasingly grotesque. Yet neither the media nor foreign
governments (including those of France, Germany and Russia) have had the
courage of openly accusing the Bush administration of lying to the UN
Security Council, to build a pretext for waging war in violation of the UN
charter
According
to a "top secret British document", quoted by the BBC "there
is nothing but enmity between Iraq and Al Qaeda. The BBC said the leak came
from [British] intelligence officials upset that their work was being used
to justify war." (quoted in Daily News, New York, 6 February
2003). Ironically, State department documents as well the powerful Council
on Foreign Relations (CFR) which plays a behind the scenes role in US
military planning, suggest that Colin Powell’s statements at the UN are
fabricated:
"The
question of Iraqi links to al-Qaeda remains murky, although senior Bush
administration officials insist such ties exist… [M]any experts and State
Department officials note that any al-Qaeda presence in Iraq probably lies
in northern regions beyond Saddam’s control. Many experts say there is
scant evidence of ties between al-Qaeda and Iraq, noting that al-Qaeda’s
loathing for "impious" Arab governments makes it an unlikely
bedfellow for Saddam’s secular regime." (Council on Foreign Relations
(CFR) at http://www.cfrterrorism.org/groups/alqaeda3.html )
Moreover,
in a press
conference held together with British Prime Minister Tony Blair in late
January 2003, President Bush flatly denied the existence of links
between Baghdad and Al Qaeda:
[Adam
Boulton, Sky News (London):] One question for you both. Do you believe that
there is a link between Saddam Hussein, a direct link, and the men who
attacked on September the 11th?
THE
PRESIDENT: I can't make that claim.
THE
PRIME MINISTER: That answers your question.
The
president’s answer contradicts the statement made barely a month later by
Sec Colin Powell to the UN Security Council where he accused Baghdad of
harboring Al Qaeda.
Fabricated Terrorist
Warnings
The day
following Colin Powell's flopped presentation to the UN Security Council,
the Bush administration declared an ‘Orange Code’ Terror Alert.
Disinformation was now being fabricated in a totally improvised fashion.
Anti-aircraft missiles were immediately deployed around Washington. The
media became inundated with stories on Iraqi support to an impending Al
Qaeda attack:
‘The
nation is now on Orange Alert because intelligence intercepts and simple
logic both suggest that our Islamic enemies know the best way to strike at
us is through terrorism on U.S. soil.‘ (New York Post, 11 Feb
2003).
A
fabricated story emanating from the CIA on so-called ‘radioactive dirty
bombs’ had been planted in the news chain (ABC News, 13 Feb 2003). Sec.
Powell warned that
"it
would be easy for terrorists to cook up radioactive ‘dirty’ bombs to
explode inside the U.S. … ‘How likely it is, I can't say... But I think it
is wise for us to at least let the American people know of this
possibility.’"(ABC This Week quoted in Daily
News (New York), 10 Feb. 2003).
Meanwhile,
network TV warned that "American hotels, shopping malls or
apartment buildings could be al Qaeda's targets as soon as next
week…".Following the announcement, tens of thousands of Americans
rushed to purchase duct tape, plastic sheets and gas-masks.
It later
transpired that the terrorist alert was fabricated by the CIA, in all
likelihood in consultation with the State Department (ABC News, 13 Feb. 2003).
The FBI, for the first time had pointed its finger at the CIA. While
tacitly acknowledging that the alert was a fake, Homeland Security
Secretary Tom Ridge decided to maintain the ‘Orange Code’ alert:
"Despite
the fabricated report, there are no plans to change the threat level.
Officials said other intelligence has been validated and that the high
level of precautions is fully warranted." ( ABC
News, 13 Feb. 2003 ).
A few
days later, in another failed propaganda initiative, a mysterious Osama bin
Laden audio tape was presented by Sec. Colin Powell to the US Congress as
‘evidence’ that the Islamic terrorists "are making common cause with a
brutal dictator". (US official quoted in The Toronto Star, 12
Feb. 2003). Curiously, the audio tape was in Colin Powell's possession
prior to its broadcast by the Al Jazeera TV Network. (Ibid.) ,
Colin Powell's Role: From
Iran-Contra to September 11
Both
Colin Powell and his Deputy Richard Armitage, who casually accuse Baghdad
and other foreign governments of "harboring" Al Qaeda, played a
direct role, at different points in their careers, in supporting terrorist
organizations.
Both men
were implicated --operating behind the scenes-- in the Irangate Contra
scandal during the Reagan Administration, which involved the illegal sale
of weapons to Iran to finance the Nicaraguan Contra paramilitary army.
[Coronel
Oliver] North set up a team including [Richard] Secord; Noel Koch
[Armitage's deputy] , then assistant secretary at the Pentagon responsible
for special operations; George Cave, a former CIA station chief in Tehran,
and Colin Powell, military assistant to U.S. Defense Secretary Caspar
Weinberger...(The Guardian, December 10, 1986)
Although
Colin Powell was not directly involved in the arms' transfer negotiations,
which had been entrusted to Oliver North, he was among "at least five
men within the Pentagon who knew arms were being transferred to the
CIA." (The Record, 29 December 1986). Lieutenant General Powell was
directly instrumental in giving the "green light" to lower-level
Irangate officials in blatant violation of Congressional procedures.
According to the New York Times, Colin Powell took the decision (at
the level of military procurement), to allow the delivery of weapons to
Iran:
Hurriedly,
one of the men closest to Secretary of Defense Weinberger, Maj. Gen. Colin
Powell, bypassed the written ''focal point system'' procedures and ordered
the Defense Logistics Agency
[responsible for procurement] to turn over the first of 2,008 TOW missiles
to the C.I.A., which acted as cutout for delivery to Iran" (New
York Times, 16 February 1987)
Richard
Armitage
Richard
Armitage held the position of Assistant Secretary of Defense in the Reagan
Administration. He was in charge of coordinating covert military operations
including the Iran-Contra operation. He was in close liaison with Coronel
Oliver North. His deputy and chief anti-terrorist official .Noel Koch was
part of the team set up by Oliver North. Following the delivery of the TOW
anti-tank missiles to Iran, the proceeds of these sales were deposited in
numbered bank accounts and the money was used to finance the Nicaraguan
Contras. (UPI. 27 November 1987). A classified Israeli report
provided to the Iran- contra panels of the Congressional enquiry confirms
that Armitage ''was in the picture on the Iranian issue.'' (New York
Times, 26 May 1989):
"With
a Pentagon position that placed him over the military's covert operations
branch, Armitage was a party to the secret arms dealing from the outset. He
also was associated with former national security aide Oliver L. North in a
White House counterterrorism group, another area that would also have been
a likely focus of congressional inquiry" (Washington Post, 26
May 1989)
CIA Director
William Casey with the collaboration of Richard Armitage in the Pentagon
"ran the Mujahideen covert war against the Soviet Union…"
(quoted in Domestic
Terrorism: The Big Lie The "War") "Contragate was also
an off-the-shelf drug-financed operation run by Casey." (Ibid ).
Financing the Islamic
Brigades
The Iran
Contra procedure was similar to that used in Afghanistan, where secret aid
was channeled to the militant Islamic brigade (US News and World Report,
15 December 1986). In fact part of the proceeds of the weapons sales to
Iran had been channeled to finance the Mujahideen. :
":The
Washington Post reported that profits from the Iran arms sales were
deposited in one CIA-managed account into which the U.S. and Saudi Arabia
had placed $250 million apiece. That money was disbursed not only to the
contras in Central America but to the rebels fighting Soviet troops in
Afghanistan."(U.S. News & World Report, 15 December 1986)
The Irangate Cover-up
Reagan's
National Security Adviser Rear Admiral John Pointdexter, who was later
indicted on conspiracy charges and lying to Congress was replaced by Frank
Carlucci as National Security Adviser. And Maj. General Colin Powell was
appointed deputy to Frank Carlucci, namely "'number two" on
the National Security team.
"Both
came to the White House after the Iran contra revelations and the NSC
housecleaning [i.e. coverup] that followed [the Irangate scandal]" (The MacNeil/Lehrer NewsHour, 16 June 1987).
Needless
to say, this housecleaning was a cover-up: Colin Powell was in on the
Irangate affair
While
several Irangate officials including John Pointdexter and Oliver North were
accused of criminal wrongdoing, the main actors in the CIA and the
Pentagon, namely Armitage and Casey, were never indicted, neither was
Lieutenant General Colin Powell who authorized the procurement of TOW
missiles from the Defense Logistics
Agency .
Moreover,
while weapons were being sold covertly to Iran, Washington was also
supplying weapons through official channels to Baghdad. In other words,
Washington was arming both sides in the Iran-Iraq war. And who was
in charge of negotiating those weapons sales to Baghdad? Donald Rumsfeld
Criminalisation
of the State: Links between US Officials and Al Qaeda
These
historical links to terrorist organisations are but the tip of the
iceberg: Recent evidence suggests that Colin
Powell and his Deputy Richard Armitage were involved in the political
cover-up of the September 11 attacks In fact the evidence points to
political complicity at the highest echelons of the Bush Administration.
It is
the Bush Administration rather than the Iraqi government which has links to
Islamic terrorism. But none of this information has trickled down to the
broader public and the media considers the links of successive US
administrations to the militant Islamic network as largely irrelevant. (For
details and analysis see the extensive bibliographic references indicated
below)
There
are documented links between Al Qaeda and senior Bush Administration
officials including Sec. Colin Powell
and Deputy Sec. Richard Armitage.
Documented by the US Congress, there are links record between
President Clinton and Al Qaeda .
The
Chairman of the 9/11 Investigation Commission Thomas Kean appointed by
President Bush was a business partner of a powerful member of the bin Laden
family.(See Fortune
Magazine, January 22, 2003 ; Xymphora,
December 2002 See also Global Outlook,
No. 4, 2003 ) .
There is
evidence of dubious links involving members of the US Congress, including Senator Bob
Graham and Rep. Porter Goss, chairmen of the Senate and House committees
on Intelligence.. Colin Powell and
Richard Armitage had high level talks with the former ISI Chief General
Mahmoud Ahmad in the immediate wake of 9/11. Now it just so happens
that according to the FBI and Indian intelligence, General Mahmoud,
the head of Pakistan's military intelligence and the alleged
"money-man" behind the 9/11 attacks, had transferred funds to
9/11 ringleader Mohammed Atta. There is also extensive evidence of
business links between the Bush and bin Laden families (See George W. Bush
Financial Scams: CRG selection of articles ).
Tabulated
below are a number of documented "links" of senior US officials
and elected politicians to the Islamic terrorist network. The sources of
the information and the URL (where available) are indicated in the
right hand column.
This
information is crucial at a time when the Bush Administration is accusing
Baghdad of having links to international terrorism. What is provided below
is a synopsis based on numerous studies, documents and reports. For an
in-depth analysis as well as historical overview of the broad relationship
between the US government and Islamic terrorism, the reader is
referred to the bibliography indicated below.
Table 1,
Historical Background:
"Links"
of US Officials to Al Qaeda and other Terrorist Organizations (partial list)
|
Official
|
Circumstances
|
Document or Source
|
|
Jimmy Carter
|
Signed first directive for covert
support to the Islamic militant network in Afghanistan in July 1979
|
Interview with Brzezinski in the Nouvel
Observateur, 15-21 January 1998
|
|
Zbigniew Brzezinski, National Security
Adviser to President Carter
|
As National Security Adviser to Jimmy
Carter, Brzezinski was the architect of covert support to the Islamic
militant network in the Soviet Afghan war.
|
Interview with
Brzezinski in the Nouvel Observateur, 15-21 January 1998
|
|
Ronald Reagan
|
Signed National
Security Decision Directive 166, (1985) which allowed for stepped up
covert aid to the Islamic brigades in the Soviet-Afghan war.
|
Washington Post, July 19, 1992
|
|
George H. W. Bush
|
Continued the covert support to the
Islamic militant network initiated under Carter and the Reagan
presidencies.
Provided support to Iran Contra
officials during his term as Vie Presdient
Business ties to the bin Laden family
through the Carlyle Group.
|
Wall Street Journal,
27 September 2001
Fortune, 8
March 2002
The New York Times,
February 12, 1989
Salon.com, 19 November 2001
Foreign
Policy in Focus, 30 April 2002
|
|
Bill Clinton
|
Ordered collaboration of the US
military with Al Qaeda operatives during the Civil war in Bosnia. Supported the
KLA, which was also being supported by Al Qaeda.
|
Republican Party Committee of the US Congress,
1997
|
|
Anthony Lake, National Security
Adviser to President Clinton
|
Ordered covert support to the Islamic
terrorist organizations fighting in Bosnia (1993-95)
|
Republican Party
Committee of the US Congress, 1997
|
Table 2:
Bush Administration Officials:
Links to
Al Qaeda and the 9/11 Terrorists (partial list)
|
Name of Official
|
Nature of Link
|
Source of Information
|
|
George W. Bush
|
Business links in the 1980s when he
was in the Texas oil business to the Bin Laden family including Salem bin
Laden (Osama’s brother) and Khalid bin Mahfouz (Osama’s brother in law).
identified in the 9/11
victims families’ lawsuit as the financier of 9/11.
Bin Mahfouz
is suspected to have funnelled millions of dollars to the Al Qaeda
network.
|
Intelligence
Newsletter, 2 March 2000 , AFP London 7 November 2001, Salon.com,
19 November 2001 , Boston Herald, 11 December 2001, Bush Watch 2001 , In these Times,
12 November 2001
George W. Bush
Financial Scams: CRG selection of articles
|
|
Colin Powell, Secretary of State
|
Negotiated the
terms of Pakistan’s cooperation in the war on terrorism with the moneyman
behind 9/11, General Mahmoud Ahmad, head of Pakistan Military
Intelligence (ISI). The General was according to several reports,
including the FBI is alleged to have transferred $100.000 to the
ringleader of 9/11 Mohammed Atta.
Colin Powell was
also involved behind the scenes in the Iran Contra affair. Maj.
General Powell authorized the illegal transfer of weapons to Iran.
|
Miami Herald, 16 September 2001,
Washington Post,
ABC News 30 September
2001,
AFP, 10 October, 2001,
Times of India, 9
October 2001
|
|
Richard Armitage, Deputy Secretary of
State
|
Involved in the covert plan to support
the militant Islamic base from its inception during the Reagan
Administration. Also involved in the Iran Contra scandal which consisted
in the illegal sale of weapons to Iran to finance the Nicaraguan Contras.
Richard
Armitage also met the alleged money-man behind 9/11, General Mahmoud
Ahmad in meetings at the state Department on Sept 12 and 13
|
Miami Herald, 16 September 2001,
Washington Post, ABC
News 30 September 2001, AFP, 10 October, 2001, Times of India, 9 October
2001,
United Press International,
18 July 2001
|
|
Marc Grossman, Under Secretary of State
|
Meetings with
ISI Chief General Mahmoud Ahmad in the week prior to 9/11
|
|
|
George Tenet, CIA Director
|
Meetings with
ISI Chief General Mahmoud Ahmad in the week prior to 9/11
|
|
|
Sen. Bob Graham and Rep. Porter Goss,
Chairmen of the Select Committees on Intelligence of the Senate and House
|
Meetings with ISI Chief Mahmoud Ahmad,
the moneyman behind the terrorists in Pakistan in late August 2001, Meeting with
the ISI Chief on the morning of September 11.
The Council
on Foreign Relations views the ISI as a terrorist organization .
|
Miami Herald, 16 September 2001, 16 Washington
Post, 18 May 2002
Council on
Foreign Relations
|
|
John Pointdexter, Heads the Total
Information Awareness Program (TIA)
|
Involved in conspiracy in the Irangate
Contra scandal. Indicted of "conspiring to defraud the government by
diverting funds from secret US arms sales to Iran" .
|
Numerous press
reports. See UPI, 13 December 1988 New York Times 10
December 1988
|
|
John Negroponte, US Permanent
Representative to the United Nations
|
John Negroponte, the US official
involved in current negotiations in UN Security Council, was involved in supporting
paramilitary death squadrons while he was US ambassador to Honduras in
the 1980s.
The Contra were operating out of
Honduras with military aid provided from the sale of weapons to Iran.
"As the American Ambassador in Honduras from November 1981 to June
1985, Mr. Negroponte was instrumental in the military buildup of the Nicaraguan
rebels [Contra]".
|
New York Times 13
December 1988,
San Francisco Examiner
|
|
Thomas Kean, Chairman of the 9/11 Commission
|
Business
partner of Khalid bin Mahfouz and Mohammed Al Ahmoudi in the Hess-Delta
joint venture. Bin Mahfouz is according to the CIA, the brother in
law of Osama bin Laden
|
Fortune
Magazine ,
February 2003 , Energy Compass, 15 Nov. 2002
Global Outlook,
no 4. 2003
|
Implications for the
Antiwar movement
What are
the implications for the Anti-war movement? This relationship of the Bush
Administration to international terrorism is a matter of public record,
which indelibly points to the criminalisation of the upper echelons of US
State apparatus.
Let's
use this information to undo the Bush Administration's war plans:
Sensitize
our fellow citizens.
Expose
the Links.
Because
when the truth trickles down, the leaders' war plans will not have a shred
of legitimacy in the eyes of millions of Americans who believe that
Al Qaeda is a threat to America and that their president is committed to
their security.
The Bush
Administration has been pushing the lies to the brink. Colin Powell
presents phony intelligence to the UN Security Council. President Bush says
in his State of the Union Address that he wants to "liberate
Iraq", yet an earlier
statement emanating from the White House confirms that the administration
is contemplating the use of nuclear weapons. The Propaganda campaign is
fatally flawed because people no longer believe the lies.
And when
the lies emanating from the seat of political authority are openly
questioned, the legitimacy of the leaders is threatened. And the lies
eventually backlash on their State sponsors.
And this
constitutes and opportunity for the antiwar movement.
To
reverse the tide of war, the propaganda apparatus must be effectively
disarmed. What this requires is an information campaign which reveals the
causes and consequences of war, sensitizes all sectors of the population
with a view to ultimately breaking the legitimacy of the main political and
military actors.
The
antiwar movement in the US and around the World has successfully challenged
Bush’s war agenda. However, it has not unraveled the lies pertaining
to September 11 and the so-called "war on terrorism" which
constitutes the cornerstone of the Administration’s war propaganda.
September
11 is used profusely as a justification for waging a preemptive war against
Iraq. It is part of the Administration’s doctrine of
"self-defense".
Moreover,
while mobilizing millions of people around the World, the antiwar protest
movement remains profoundly divided. Many of the civil society and trade union
organizations which have taken a stance against the invasion of Iraq,
were nonetheless supportive
of the Bush administration’s invasion of Afghanistan in retaliation to
the September 11 attacks. While integrating the anti-war movement, they
remain convinced that Al Qaeda is "a threat to America" and
global security. They firmly believe in the so-called "war on
terrorism’ against the alleged perpetrators of 9/11 and are broadly
supportive of the Bush administration’s anti-terrorist agenda: "We
are against the invasion of Iraq, but we should go after Al Qaeda."
"We believe that Iraq is not a threat against World peace, but we
support the Administration’s "war on terrorism". In turn,
many prominent progressive intellectuals and foreign policy analysts have
not only dismissed the links of the Bush Administration to Al Qaeda, they
have upheld the Administration's "War on terrorism".
This
ambivalence weakens the antiwar movement because it ultimately serves to
uphold the legitimacy of "the anti-terrorist" agenda at home and
around the world. Under an anti-terrorist banner, the Administration
launched "Operation Enduring Freedom" which consists in sending
US Special Forces to collaborate with foreign governments in the "war
on terrorism". In the US, it launched the Patriot
Act, which repeals fundamental civil rights in the name of the "war on
terrorism".
The war
on terrorism is an integral part of Bush’s National Security
Doctrine . It is is being used as a pretext for waging war on Iraq. Many
antiwar activists are unaware that successive US
administrations have over the last 20 years supported Islamic terrorism
including Al Qaeda . The latter is a creation of the CIA. It is a key
instrument of US foreign policy.
At this
crucial juncture in our history, we must understand that antiwar sentiment
in itself does not undermine the war agenda. The same applies to the
diplomatic deadlock at the UN Security Council: The US is intent upon waging
war with or without UN approval.
The only
way to prevent this war from happening in the weeks ahead is to unseat the
rulers, who are war criminals.
A
precondition for breaking the legitimacy of the Bush Administration is to
fully reveal and expose its links to international terrorism, by undoing
its propaganda campaign and spreading the truth through a well organised
grassroots citizen's information campaign.
And the
way to unseat the rulers is to break their legitimacy in the eyes of the
people. In other words, it is necessary to fully reveal the lies concerning
the so-called "war on terrorism" to our fellow citizens, which
are used to justify the invasion of Iraq,
Selected Bibliographical
Material and Links
Centre
for Research on Globalization (CRG), Foreknowledge of 9-11
:A Compilation of
CRG articles and documents in support of a 9-11 Investigation
Centre
for Research on Globalization (CRG), 9/11 Reader and Archive
Nic
Levis, The
9/11 Truth Movement Selected Resources for Researchers and Activists
Centre
for Research on Globalization (CRG), George W. Bush
Financial Scams: CRG selection of articles .
Propaganda
Matrix Archive
on Prior knowledge at /www.propagandamatrix.com/
Centre
for Cooperative Research, The
Complete 9/11 Timeline at www.cooperativeresearch.org/
Michel
Chossudovsky is the author of international best seller War
and Globalization, The Truth behind September 11. To order the book
online click here
This
article first appeared on the websit of Global research at: http://globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO303D.htm
|